[ad_1]
According to a draft proposal within the EU, companies that utilize generative AI tools like ChatGPT will be obligated to disclose any copyrighted materials used in the development of their systems.
ChatGPT became very popular in a short period of time, and is now used in many different fields. Image credit: Emiliano Vittoriosi via Unsplash, free license
This agreement is still in development and is a part of the EU’s efforts to establish comprehensive legislation governing this technology, making it potentially the first of its kind worldwide.
This move could have been anticipated in the past. The European Commission has been working on the AI Act for almost two years to regulate emerging AI technology, which gained significant investment and popularity after the introduction of OpenAI’s AI-powered chatbot, ChatGPT.
The initial draft stage has already been approved – members of the European Parliament have agreed to advance the draft to the next stage, known as the trilogue. In this stage, the EU lawmakers and member states will negotiate and finalize the details of the upcoming bill.
According to the proposed regulations, AI tools will be categorized based on their perceived level of risk, ranging from minimal to limited, high, and unacceptable. Areas of concern include biometric surveillance, the dissemination of misinformation, and the use of discriminatory language.
Although high-risk AI tools will not be banned, companies using them will be required to maintain a high level of transparency in their operations.
Additionally, companies deploying generative AI tools such as ChatGPT or image generator Midjourney will need to disclose any copyrighted material used in the development of their systems.
This provision was added recently within the past two weeks as part of the ongoing discussions. Initially, some committee members proposed a complete ban on the use of copyrighted material for training generative AI models, but this idea was abandoned in favor of a transparency requirement.
Svenja Hahn, a European Parliament deputy, stated that the agreement reached was a balanced compromise that aims to regulate AI appropriately, safeguard citizens’ rights, foster innovation, and stimulate the economy, while addressing both conservative concerns about surveillance and leftist calls for over-regulation.
According to Macquarie analyst Fred Havemeyer, the EU’s proposal demonstrates a tactful approach rather than adopting a “ban first, and ask questions later” stance proposed by some parties.
[ad_2]
Source link